| Division of Animal Health Disease Control Program Quarantines and Embargoes on Animals |
| Proposed Readoption with Amendments: N.J.A.C. 2:5 Proposed New Rules: N.J.A.C. 2:5-1.1, 2.1, 4.1, 4.2, and 5.1 Proposed Repeals: N.J.A.C. 2:5-2.3, 3.2, and 3.3 Authorized By: State Board of Agriculture and Charles M. Kuperus, Secretary, Department of Agriculture Authority: N.J.S.A. 4:1-11.1, 4:1-17, 4:1-18, 4:1-21.5 and N.J.S.A. 4:5-1 et seq. Calendar Reference: See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement. Proposal Number: PRN 2005-240 Submit comments by September 3, 2005 to: Dr. Nancy E. Halpern The agency proposal follows: Summary Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:14B-5.1, the rules in this chapter are scheduled to expire June 5, 2005. In accordance with N.J.S.A. 52:14B-5.1c, the submission of this notice of proposal to the Office of Administrative Law extends that expiration date 180 days to December 2, 2005. The State Board of Agriculture and Department of Agriculture have reviewed the rules proposed for readoption and, as amended, finds these rules to be necessary, reasonable and adequate, efficient, understandable, and responsive to the purpose for which it was promulgated. Readoption of these rules with amendments, new rules, and repeals, is necessary as it describes various embargoes and import requirements for livestock entering New Jersey in order to meet the legislatively required mandate to provide adequate disease control for New Jersey’s livestock. Social Impact The prevention and control of disease by the regulation of programs necessary to prevent the importation of diseased and/or disease carrying animals that may infect New Jersey’s livestock and poultry population is a key element to the viability of animal agriculture. These rules proposed for readoption with amendments, new rules, and repeals, set updated requirements for the socially beneficial programs that prevent the introduction of diseases harmful to the health of the animal husbandry industry. The changes have been made to reflect scientific updates since the last adoption of these rules. Economic Impact The burden of these rules proposed for readoption with amendments, repeals and new rules falls upon the farmer, consumer and the intermediaries between the two. Compliance with rules proposed for readoption with amendments, repeals and new rules, imposes minimal additional costs to farmers and dealers as a result of processing paperwork, treating any diseases found, and following the additional biosecurity requirements. However, even these costs are outweighed by the safety of the products produced and a higher economic return from the product as a result of compliance with these amended rules. Since the costs of treatment and eradication of diseases far exceed the costs of surveillance in prevention, it is in the best interests of New Jersey’s agriculture industry to have strong regulations in place for quarantines and embargoes. In general, a larger and healthier supply of animals gets to market, commands a better price, and the consumer benefits by receiving a safe and nutritious food product. Federal Standards Statement Executive Order No. 27 (1994) and P.L. 1995, c. 65 require State agencies which adopt, readopt or amend State regulations that exceed any Federal standards or requirements to include in the rulemaking document a comparison with Federal law. A Federal standard analysis is not required because the subject matter of the readoption with amendments, new rules and repeals is governed by the New Jersey Department of Agriculture in accordance with, but not exceeding applicable Federal requirements or standards. In 9 CFR 145, Animals and Animal Products, The National Poultry Improvement Plan establishes standards and guidelines for the poultry industry with respect to certain diseases including Pullorum disease and Avian Influenza, among others. Under the auspices of The National Poultry Improvement Plan the United States Secretary of Agriculture issued a “Declaration of Extraordinary Emergency Because of Exotic Newcastle Disease,” (68 FR 1432 Docket No. 03-001-1, 68 FR 3507 Docket No. 03-001-2, 68 FR 3561 Docket No. 03-003-3), effective (CA--1/6/03, NV--1/17/03, AZ--2/12/03) enabling APHIS of the USDA to conduct a program for the eradication of END wherever it may be found in the each of the respective states. In addition, APHIS has outlined uniform standards for a State-Federal-Industry Cooperative Program for the Prevention and Control of H5 and H7 Low Pathogenicity Avian Influenza in the Live Bird Marketing System, which became effective October 20, 2004. The rules proposed for readoption with amendments, new rules and repeals are substantially the same as, but do not exceed, those imposed by Federal law and uniform standards. Jobs Impact The rules proposed for readoption with amendments, new rules and repeals will not result in the generation or loss of any jobs in the State.
For the reasons set forth in the Summary, Social Impact and Economic Impact above, the rules proposed for readoption with amendments, new rules and amendments will have a positive impact on the agriculture industry, particularly the livestock and poultry industry, since it minimizes the introduction and/or spread of disease to New Jersey livestock and poultry. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis While most farmers are small businesses as that term is defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-16 et seq., the rules proposed for readoption with amendments, new rules and repeals do not impose any new or increased reporting, recordkeeping, and/or other compliance requirements beyond those already mandated by the authorizing statutes. In order to comply with these rules, professional services, in the form of veterinary care and treatment will have to be retained. The costs of these services will vary depending upon animal species, herd size and type of disease. Horse dealers will continue to provide negative Coggin’s tests for horses they take to auctions. There will be no capital expenditures. Smart Growth Impact The rules proposed for readoption with amendments, new rules and repeals will have no impact on smart growth or upon the State Development and Redevelopment Plan. |

