Legal Links Management Regional Offices Contact Us
Home
History
Structure
Cases
Billing
Past Public Defenders
Trial Services
Our Services
Client Rights
Client Reponsibilities
Divisions
Administration
Appellate
Law Guardian
Office of Juvenile Service
Office of Parental Representation
Special Hearing
Intensive Supervision Program
Drug Court
Mental Health Advocacy
Office of Dispute Settlement
 
 

Headlines

 

Office of the Public Defender Reaction to Henderson Decision
   

August 24, 2011

Public Defender Joseph E. Krakora, who argued Mr. Henderson's case before the New Jersey Supreme Court, praised today's decision saying that he was "deeply gratified that the Court recognized the validity of over 30 years of scientific research on memory and eyewitness identification" and expressed his "appreciation for the thoroughness and thoughtfulness expressed in their decision."

"Perhaps as important," Mr. Krakora said, "was that our Court has mandated that judges and juries dealing with identification issues take into account all of the factors that impact on a witness's ability to make an accurate identification."

"The unmistakable benefit to all of New Jersey's citizens in today's decision," he continued, "is that it will go a long way toward eliminating wrongful convictions based on mistaken identifications. No one wants to send an innocent man or woman to jail."

Link to NJ Supreme Court decision:

http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/mcs/case_law/state_v_henderson.pdf