 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | | | |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Brown
Tide Assessment - Newsletters
|
| Return
to Brown Tide Home |
| Newsletter
2 - July 2000 |
Newsletter
3 - July 2001 |
Newsletter
4 - October 2001 |
Newsletter
5 - July 2002 |
Newsletter
6 - October 2002 |
Newsletter
Number 1 - June 2000
There
is a substantial brown tide bloom
this year in Little Egg Harbor in
southern Barnegat Bay. The NJDEP
has confirmed the highest counts
of the brown tide algae, Aureococcus
anophagefferens, were one and
half million to over two million
cells per milliliter on June 8.
A concentration of one million cells
per milliliter represents a full
bloom condition. The NJ Department
of Environmental Protection is conducting
an assessment of the brown tide
occurrence in Barnegat Bay throughout
2000. A team of scientists and managers
from state and federal government
agencies and academic institutions
are participating in the project.
This is the first of a series of
Newsletters that will inform the
public as to the status of the occurrence
of brown tide blooms and to provide
a forum to share data and expertise
on this issue with the hope of reducing
and managing these blooms in the
future. NJDEPs Bureau of Marine
Water Monitoring and U.S. EPA are
collecting water samples in Barnegat
Bay and other sites. Samples are
being enumerated for the brown tide
organism by Dr. David Caron of the
University of Southern California,
using a newly developed monoclonal
antibody technique that is accurate,
precise, and provides information
on counts, within a few days of
collection. Other members of the
team include USGS, Rutgers Institute
of Marine & Coastal Sciences
and the Center for Remote Sensing
and Spatial Analysis, NJDEPs
Bureau of Shell Fisheries, Dr. Elizabeth
Cosper (Coastal Environmental Studies),
and Dr. O.R. Anderson (Columbia
University).
Brown
tide blooms, caused by a minute
alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens,
discolor the water a light brown.
While they are not a human health
threat in terms of bathing or seafood
consumption, they may cause ecological
damage to shellfish and submerged
aquatic grasses in the Barnegat
Bay. |
Newsletter
Number 2 - July 2000
The
brown tide bloom that occurred during June and early July, in Barnegat
Bay and Little Egg Harbor, subsided by July 12. The latest data from the
laboratory of Dr. David Caron (Univ. of Southern California) indicate
that several sites in Little Egg Harbor, including Ship Bottom and Tuckerton,
NJ, had a substantial brown tide bloom with the highest concentrations
of Aureococcus anophagefferens in early June. Cell counts over
a million cells per milliliter (mL) represent full bloom conditions. The
highest cell counts were observed in the vicinity of Little Egg Harbor
with cell counts up to 2.2 million cells per mL on June 8 and reduced
to 30,000 cells per mL in early July. At Tuckerton, the counts reached
two million per mL on June 15 and decreased to a low of 35,000 cells per
mL on July 12. At Ship Bottom, the cell numbers were 1.8 million cells
per mL on June 23 and decreased to 410,000 cells per mL on July 12. Cell
counts that rise to over 500,000 cells per milliliter indicate the beginning
of a bloom. However the lower numbers in this range in July clearly indicated
a decline from higher numbers of the bloom. Data are available at selected
sampling stations during June and July (see
Attachments 1-3). A list of stations corresponding to municipalities
is provided (Attachment
4). Additional sampling will be conducted throughout the year.
The
NJDEP recently received reports from Biosphere, Inc., an aquaculture facility
located in Tuckerton, that, due to reduced growth of juvenile hard clams
during the June brown tide bloom, clams were relocated to waters at Sea
Bright where no brown tide blooms were reported. As the brown tide bloom
subsided in later June, in Little Egg Harbor, clams were relocated back
to the facility in Tuckerton. Rutgers University Extension Service (Jeff
Flimlin) reported to NJDEP that mortalities in hard clam seed occurred
in commercial nurseries near the bridge at Great Bay Blvd., in Great Bay,
south of Tuckerton, NJ. However, the concentrations of A. anophagefferens
at most of these stations were not at bloom levels.
Brown
tide blooms, caused by a minute alga, A. anophagefferens, discolor
the water a light brown. While they are not a human health threat from
bathing or seafood consumption, they may cause ecological damage to shellfish
and submerged aquatic grasses in the Barnegat Bay. |
Newsletter
3 - July 2001
The
NJ Department of Environmental Protection is continuing the second year
of assessment of the brown tide occurrence in Barnegat Bay throughout
2001. The assessment is being conducted jointly by the NJDEP, NJ Sea Grant/NJ
Marine Sciences Consortium, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Rutgers
University, University of Southern California, and Columbia University.
The goal of the assessment is to continue to characterize brown tide blooms,
caused by a minute alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens, in coastal
waters of New Jersey in order to identify environmental factors that may
promote and sustain these blooms and to document negative impacts to natural
resources so that mitigation strategies can be developed. Brown tide blooms
can discolor the water a yellow brown which can be undesirable
to recreational uses. While they are not a human health threat from either
bathing or seafood consumption, blooms may cause ecological damage to
shellfish and submerged aquatic grasses in Barnegat Bay.
The
New Jersey Marine Science Consortium/New Jersey Sea Grant and the U.S.
EPA are collecting water samples. Water samples are being analyzed by
monoclonal analysis, a newly developed immunofluorescent technique to
enumerate the minute brown tide organism, by Dr. David Caron (USC). In
addition, nutrient data analyzed, as part of the U.S. EPA Coastal 2000
program will be available.
Results
of sampling from April 16 through June 4, 2001 show that concentrations
of Aureococcus appeared to rise, fall, and rise again within a
few days in some stations in Little Egg Harbor. April concentrations at
most stations sampled from northern Barnegat Bay through Little Egg Harbor
were below 5.0 X 103 cells per mL (Category 1 bloom, as defined
in the recently proposed *Brown Tide Index, Gastrich & Wazniak, manuscript
in preparation).
By
May 25, there was a significant brown tide bloom in Little Egg Harbor
at Ship Bottom with a concentration of Aureococcus anophagefferens
greater than 106 cells per mL which dropped to 4.0 X 105
cells per mL on May 30 but increased again to 8.4 X 105 cells
per mL on June 4. There were reports of patchy spots of brown water in
areas in Little Egg Harbor during May and June as well as reports that
a local aquaculture facility temporarily moved their juvenile hard clams
to waters that did not have brown tide blooms. On May 25, bloom concentrations
of Aureococcus anophagefferens at a stations near Beach Haven Terrace
were over 8.5 X 105 cells per mL and dropped to
approximately 5.0 X 105 cells per mL (Category 3) by June 4.
All these blooms were classified as Category 3 and potentially harmful
to shellfish according to a recently proposed Brown Tide Index* explained
below. Sampling results on June 11 showed that some stations in Little
Egg Harbor and southern Barnegat Bay were over 5.0 X 105 cells
per mL and by June 18, four of these stations had brown tide counts that
increased to over one million cells per mL, or Category 3 blooms. Other
stations in Little Egg Harbor had Category 2 blooms in May which increased
to Category 3 blooms in June.
Results
are not complete and additional sampling is underway. There were no blooms
observed in northern Barnegat Bay. The Department, in cooperation with
Rutgers University, will be analyzing brown tide growth in relation to
specific environmental factors (e.g., salinity, temperature, nutrients,
etc.) in the next year.
*Brown
Tide Bloom Index (Gastrich & Wazniak, manuscript in preparation)
Category
1 brown tide blooms: <35,000 cells per milliliter (no reported negative
ecological
impacts)
Category
2 brown tide blooms: >35,000 to 200,000 cells per milliliter (potential
moderate to
severe ecological impacts on shellfish)
Category
3 brown tide blooms: >200,000 cells per milliliter (potential severe
ecological impacts to shellfish, seagrasses and plankton)
|
Newsletter
4 - OCTOBER 2001
The
NJ Department of Environmental Protection
has completed the second year of
assessment of the brown tide occurrence
in coastal waters in cooperation
with the NJ Sea Grant/ NJ Marine
Sciences Consortium, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 2, Rutgers
University, and the University of
Southern California.
The goal of the assessment was to
characterize the spatial and temporal
extent of brown tide blooms, caused
by a minute alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens,
in coastal waters of New Jersey.
The brown tide monitoring is based
on selected stations of the Bureau
of Marine Water Monitoring's Coastal
Monitoring Program, the U.S. EPA's
Coastal 2000 program, and USGS gaging
stations in order to collect as
much water quality and flow data
as possible. The Brown Tide Assessment
Project will measure routine water
quality parameters and provide data
on nutrients - measurements that
may be contributing factors to the
promotion and maintenance of brown
tide blooms.
The NJDEP used the newly developed
Brown Tide Bloom Index (Gastrich &,
Wazniak, 2001; see June 2001 Brown
Tide Newsletter) to assess the spatial
extent of brown tide blooms in 2000-01.
Figures 1-3 below show a comparison
of brown tide counts in April through
September in 2000 and 2001.
Figure 1. shows stations
in Raritan Bay and northern Barnegat
Bay. Previous information indicated
that brown tide blooms were not reported
in this area or that elevated concentrations
of brown tide occurred before 2000.
However, in 2000-01, all stations
had Category 2 blooms that can have
potential negative impacts on shellfish.
Stations
not showing elevated brown tide
counts (in blue) may not have been
monitored during the months when
blooms are known to occur.
Figure 1. Brown Tide Monitoring
Stations: Raritan Bay to Upper Barnegat
Bay: 2000-01
Figure 2 shows that the
areas of southern Barnegat Bay and
Little Egg Harbor had Category 3
blooms, the most severe brown tide
blooms. Based on the criteria in
the Brown Tide Bloom Index, the
extent and magnitude of brown tide
blooms were. comparable in 2000
and 2001 and comparable to the 1995
bloom and other anecdotal data on
significant brown tide blooms in
this area.
Figure 2. Brown Tide Monitoring
Stations: Southern Barnegat Bay
and Little Egg Harbor
Figure 3 shows that Category
3 blooms occurred in Great Bay which
is comparable to previous information.
However, the Category 2 bloom that
occurred in 2000-01 at the southernmost
station in Great Egg Harbor is new
information compared to previous
reports.
Figure 3. Brown Tide Monitoring
Stations: Great Bay south to Great
Egg Harbor.
The results indicate that while
the brown tide organism was detected
at most stations in 2000-0 1, potentially
harmful brown tide blooms may not
occur at all stations. The cause
of blooms in some areas and not
in others is not well understood.
The implication of this analysis
of brown tides during 2000 and 2001
is that 1) concentrations of brown
tide in New Jersey coastal waters
are high enough to contribute to
potential impacts to shellfish and
seagrasses in areas of Barnegat
Bay; 2) future monitoring for brown
tides should be extended to coastal
bays south of Great Egg Harbor with
more frequent sampling at stations
between Great Bay and Great Egg
Harbor; 3) monitoring of brown tides
should be continued at existing
sites along environmental gradients;
and 4) assessments and research
are needed to document impacts to
natural resources resulting from
brown tide blooms of contributing
environmental factors (esp. comparisons
between those sites with brown tide
blooms and those without blooms)
in order to better understand the
contributing factors to the promotion,
maintenance and termination of these
blooms. |
| Newsletter
Number 5 - July 2002
The
NJ Department of Environmental Protection, in cooperation with the NJ
Sea Grant/NJ Marine Sciences Consortium; U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 2; Rutgers University; and the University of Southern California,
completed water sampling during April and May,
2002. This report
includes partial results of data collected April through June, 2002.
The
goal of the assessment was to characterize the spatial and temporal extent
of brown tide blooms caused by a minute alga, Aureococcus
anophagefferens, at eleven water quality network stations in the coastal
waters of New Jersey.
The brown tide concentrations were evaluated using the newly developed
Brown Tide Bloom Index (Gastrich & Wazniak, 2002; see Brown Tide Newsletter,
June 2001, Figs. 1-3) that relates concentrations of the brown tide organism,
A. anophagefferens, to potential negative impacts on natural resources
including shellfish, seagrasses and protozoa.
Figure
1 shows one station that was monitored in northern Barnegat Bay (1635E)
near the Toms River. While
this station had a Category 1 (< 35,000 cells/mL) (see legend below)
brown tide bloom on April 22, 2002, Aureococcus
concentrations increased to a Category 2 bloom on May 20 (143,000
cells/mL). By June 3, this
station had a Category 3 bloom (242,000 cells/mL) with the highest concentration
of 277,000 cells/mL on June 10. The 2002 brown tide concentrations were
higher at this station than those in 2001.
In 2001, low concentrations (Category 1) occurred during this same
time period. Therefore, it
will be important to monitor brown tide blooms at this station in the
future to determine whether blooms are increasing in severity.
Figure
2 shows brown tide concentrations in the southern Barnegat Bay and
Little Egg Harbor for May 2002.
There were Category 2 blooms already in April at some stations
(1651D, 1675, and 1719E) and concentrations at most stations increased
to Category 2 and Category 3 blooms by May 20, which is early for the
more severe blooms which usually occur in June. Seven of the eleven stations
monitored had Category 3 blooms on May 20 with concentrations ranging
from 254,000 to 851,000 cells/mL. By June 3, all stations excepting one
(1823A) in this area had Category 3 blooms with the highest concentration
of 842,000 on June 17 (1719E). Station 1834A located in the middle of
Little Egg Harbor was the exception with Category 2 blooms in May and
June. While Aureococcus
concentrations were higher in Little Egg Harbor in June in 2000 and 2001
(> 1,000,000 cells/mL), the area has experienced Category 3 blooms
for three consecutive years.
Figure
3 shows that the one station sampled in the Little Egg Harbor
Inlet (1824B) had a Category 1 bloom in April, which increased to a Category
2 bloom on May 20, and increased to a Category 3 bloom (415,000 cells/mL)
with the highest concentration on June 3.
This
information is only preliminary because monitoring for Aureococcus
anophagefferens will continue during June through September in 2002.
However, initial results above indicate concentrations of brown
tide in New Jersey coastal waters are high enough to contribute to potential
impacts to shellfish and seagrasses in areas of Barnegat Bay and Little
Egg Harbor. |
Newsletter
Number 6 - October 2002
The
NJ Department of Environmental
Protection conducted a field monitoring
program consisting of water sampling
and analysis of the brown tides
and other water quality parameters
in cooperation with the NJ Sea
Grant/NJ Marine Sciences Consortium;
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 2; Rutgers University;
and the University of Southern
California. This report includes
results of data collected April
through September, 2002. A more
comprehensive analysis of data
collected in past years is underway.
The
goal of the assessment is to characterize
the spatial and temporal extent
of brown tide blooms caused by
a minute alga, Aureococcus
anophagefferens, at eleven
water quality network stations
in the coastal waters of New Jersey.
The brown tide concentrations
were evaluated using the Brown
Tide Bloom Index (Gastrich &
Wazniak, 2002) that relates concentrations
of the brown tide organism, A.
anophagefferens, to potential
negative impacts on natural resources
including shellfish, seagrasses
and protozoa.
BROWN
TIDE BLOOM INDEX
(GASTRICH
AND WAZNIAK, 2002)
CATEGORY 1: < 35,000 Aureococcus
anophagefferens
cells ml-¹ (No observed
impacts)
CATEGORY
2:> 35,000 to <
200,000 cells ml-¹
·
Reduction in growth of juvenile
hard clams, Mercenaria mercenaria
· Reduced feeding rates
in adult hard clams
· Growth reduction
in mussels (Mytilus edulis)
and bay scallops (Argopecten
irradians)
CATEGORY
3: > 200,000 cells
ml-¹
·
Water becomes discolored yellow-brown
· Feeding rates of
mussels severely reduced
· Recruitment (renewal
of stock) failures of bay
scallops and high mortalities
· No significant growth
of juvenile hard clams
· Negative impacts
to eelgrass due to algal shading
· Copepod production
reduced and negative impacts
to protozoa
Highlights of 2002 Brown
Tide Blooms
Preliminary
spatial patterns from 2000-02
show that Aureococcus
was detected at every coastal
station monitored for three years.
Aureococcus concentrations,
mainly Category 2 and 3 blooms,
which may have significant potential
impacts on natural resources,
specifically hard clams and eelgrass,
were found in Raritan Bay, Barnegat
Bay, Little Egg Harbor and south
in Great Egg Inlet.
Results
from monitoring stations from
north to south are presented below.
Figure
1 shows the one station monitored
in northern Barnegat Bay (1635E)
near the Toms River. While this
station had a Category 1 brown
tide bloom (< 3.5 X 10
cells ml-¹)
(see legend below) on April 22,
2002, Aureococcus concentrations
increased to a Category 2 bloom
on May 20 (1.4 X 105
cells ml-¹). By June 3, concentrations
increased to a Category 3 bloom
(242,000 cells ml-¹) with
the highest concentration of 2.8
X 105 cells ml-¹
on June 10. The 2002 brown tide
concentrations were higher at
this station than in 2001. Therefore,
it will be important to monitor
brown tide blooms at this station
in the future to determine whether
blooms are increasing in severity.
The
highest concentrations of Aureococcus
in monitored New Jersey coastal
bays occurred over the last three
years in stations in Little Egg
Harbor. Figure
2 below shows the highest
concentrations of brown tide in
the southern Barnegat Bay and
Little Egg Harbor for 2002. The
concentrations in 2002 were similar
to those at the same stations
in 2000 and 2001. Category 2 bloom
levels were already occurring
in April at some stations (1651D,
1675, and 1719E) and concentrations
at most stations increased to
Category 2 and Category 3 blooms
by May 20, which is early for
the more severe blooms, which
usually occur in June. Seven of
the eleven stations monitored
had Category 3 blooms on May 20
with concentrations ranging from
2.5 X 105 to 8.5 X
105 cells ml-¹.
By June 3, all stations in Little
Egg Harbor had Category 3 blooms
with the highest concentration
of 8.42 X 105 ml-¹
on June 17 at Station 1719E. While
Aureococcus concentrations
were higher in Little Egg Harbor
in June in 2000 and 2001 (>1.0
X 106 cells ml-¹)
than in 2002, the area has experienced
Category 3 blooms for four consecutive
years. Station 1703C, in Ship
Bottom (Stafford TWP), located
under the Rte. 72 bridge and causeway,
had the highest Aureococcus
concentrations of 1.56 X 106
cells ml-¹ on June 20 while
station 1719E in Beach Haven Terrace
(Long Beach TWP) had the second
highest concentration (1.2 X 106
cells ml-¹) on June 26. While
station 1820A, located north of
Tuckerton in Little Egg Harbor
TWP, experienced Category 3 blooms
in 2001 and 2002 at concentrations
similar to other Little Egg Harbor
stations, this station had the
highest recorded Aureococcus
concentration in June 2000 at
2.2 X 106 cells ml-¹.
Figure
3 below shows the highest
concentrations of Aureococcus
in Great Bay and in bays to the
south. One station sampled at
the mouth of the Little Egg Harbor
Inlet (1824B) had a Category 1
bloom in April, which increased
to a Category 2 bloom on May 20
but the concentration did not
exceed 5.5 X 104 cells
ml-¹ (June 10) and dropped
to < 3.7 X 104 cells
ml-¹ by July 24. While one
station in Great Egg Inlet (2720B)
was only monitored once on June
2002, it had low concentrations
(Category 1) but in 2000 and 2001,
this station had Category 2 blooms.
Additional monitoring for brown
tide should be conducted at this
station and others further south.
These
early findings not only warrant
consideration of continued monitored
at existing stations to track
these blooms but also extended
monitoring to Raritan Bay and
other bays south of Great Bay
during April through September.
Preliminary
temporal patterns of brown tide
blooms in 2002 show a similarity
to previous years. Figure
4 shows the highest concentrations
of Aureococcus at monitored
stations from May through September,
2002, Category 1 concentrations
(often < 35,000 cells ml-¹)
during April increase to Category
2 blooms in May, and again, increase
to Category 3 blooms in June.
Generally, this increase in concentration
occurs as the salinity increases
to greater than 26 ppt. Higher
salinities have been shown to
be associated with brown tide
blooms in other states. However,
in 2002, some stations had Category
3 blooms earlier, in May, than
in previous years. Aureococcus
concentrations gradually decreased
to Category 2 blooms in July and
August. However, some stations
in Little Egg Harbor show a secondary
Category 3 bloom in September.
Figures
5, 6,
and 7
show the annual change in concentrations
of the brown tide blooms, caused
by Aureococcus concentrations
from May through September, at
selected stations. Station 1703C
had the highest concentrations
of Aureococcus in 2002
and 2001 and Aureococcus
concentrations are similar at
other Little Egg Harbor stations.
Stations are characterized by
low concentrations (Category 1
blooms) in April that increase
to Category 2 blooms in May and
Category 3 blooms in June. Bloom
concentrations usually drop sharply
in July/August but this may vary
and a secondary bloom may appear
at some stations (e.g., 1703C
in 2001) in September. Figure
7, Station 1824B, which is the
southern reference point, shows
much lower concentrations than
the other stations. This is an
area at the mouth of the Little
Egg Harbor where there is substantial
tidal action and influence. The
lower concentrations in this area
throughout the year (< 60,000
cells ml-¹) may result from
increased flushing due to the
tidal action mixing, which may
not promote or sustain substantial
blooms.
In
conclusion, preliminary results
show:
· Aureococcus
concentrations were detected at
every coastal station monitored
over the last three years.
· Preliminary spatial patterns
of brown tide blooms indicate
that Category 3 blooms occurred
every year for three years mainly
June, and sometimes in May, in
stations in Little Egg Harbor
and southern Barnegat Bay. Category
2 blooms occurred over the same
geographic area in Little Egg
Harbor and throughout Barnegat
Bay and other coastal bays including
Raritan Bay and to the south in
Great Egg Inlet.
· Preliminary temporal
patterns of Aureococcus
concentrations show an increase
from background levels in April
to Category 2 blooms in May to
Category 3 blooms in June which
may decrease in July and August;
in some cases, secondary Category
3 blooms may occur in some stations
in September; Category 2 blooms
may occur for longer periods than
Category 3 blooms which may contribute
to increased environmental pressure
on natural resources. Brown tide
blooms increase during June when
juvenile hard clam growth and
new growth of seagrasses were
reported, which may cause potentially
harmful impacts to these natural
resources that are already impacted
by multiple stressors.
· Concentrations of brown
tide in New Jersey coastal waters
for the last three years (2000-2002)
are high enough to contribute
to significant potential impacts
to shellfish and seagrasses in
areas of Barnegat Bay and Little
Egg Harbor.
· Other coastal bays may
be at risk for brown tide blooms.
Because brown tide blooms have
recurred for the last three years
in Barnegat Bay, Little Egg Harbor,
Great Bay, and Great Egg Inlet,
New Jersey (and occur further
south in Maryland), additional
monitoring for brown tides is
needed in coastal waters farther
south in New Jersey.
Recommendations
for additional monitoring and
studies include the following:
· Continue monitoring of
Aureococcus concentrations
at the 11 existing water quality
network stations monitored for
brown tide in 2000-2002 throughout
the year (a similar recommendation
was made by scientists and managers
in the mid-Atlantic region at
the Brown Tide Workshop in April
2001 at Monmouth University).
· Extend monitoring to
additional water quality stations
north in Raritan Bay and to water
quality stations south from Great
Bay.
· Continue to monitor water
quality parameters associated
with brown tide (e.g., salinity,
temperature) and nutrients, especially
dissolved organic nitrogen, and
other environmental parameters
simultaneously with brown tide
counts at these stations.
· Assess and document impacts
of brown tides on natural resources
(e.g., hard clams, seagrasses)
to identify potential harmful
effects and to identify areas
at risk.
A
comprehensive report summarizing
the results of the three year
study and an assessment of potential
environmental factors that may
promote brown tide blooms, as
well as geographic areas which
may be at risk for blooms (e.g.,
seagrass habitats), is available.
For
more information or to report
a brown tide bloom, contact Dr.
Mary Downes Gastrich, Brown Tide
Assessment Project Manager, in
the Division of Science, Research
and Technology at (609) 292-1895
or email Mary.Downes-Gastrich@dep.state.nj.us.
Reference:
Gastrich, M.D. and C.E. Wazniak.
2002. A Brown Tide Bloom
Index based on the potential harmful
effects of the brown tide alga,
Aureococcus anophagefferens.
Aquatic Ecosystem Health and
Management. Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.
175–190.
Figure
1. 2002 Brown Tide Assessment
Project Stations: Brown Tide Bloom
Index Results in Raritan Bay and
Northern Barnegat Bay.
Figure
2. Brown Tide Assessment Project
Stations 2002: Brown Tide Bloom
Index Results in Southern Barnegat
Bay and Little Egg Harbor.
Figure
3. 2002 Brown Tide Assessment
Project Stations: Brown Tide Bloom
Index Results in Little Egg Harbor
South to Great Egg Inlet.
Figure
4. Highest concentrations of Aureococcus
at New Jersey coastal stations
during 2002.
Figure
5. 2002 Brown tide concentrations
at the northern reference point
station in Barnegat Bay at Seaside
Park (1635E).
Figure
6. 2002 Brown Tide Concentrations
at the Ship Bottom station (1703C)
in Little Egg Harbor near the
Route 72 Causeway Bridge to Long
Beach Island.
Figure
7. 2002 Brown Tide Concentrations
at the southern reference point
station (1824B) at the mouth of
Little Egg Harbor.
|
|
|
|
Office
of Science
Dr. Gary A. Buchanan, Manager
428 East State Street
P.O. Box 409
Trenton, NJ 08625
Phone: (609) 984-6070
Fax: (609) 777-2852
For Information regarding
this site, please contact Terri
Tucker. |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |