|
|

NEW JERSEY FOOD MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM
As part of the NJDEP effort to address the issues raised by the
Federal Food Quality Protection Act, the New Jersey Food Monitoring
and Evaluation Program (NJFMEP) was initiated to catalog the pesticide
residue levels present on produce being sold and consumed in New
Jersey. Since 2000, over 350 samples have been collected from
roadside markets throughout the State. While the majority of the
commodities collected were grown in NJ, the program does not ignore
commodities that were grown in another state or country and sold
to NJ consumers. The commodities examined include apples, asparagus,
blueberries, broccoli, cauliflower, cherries, Chinese vegetables,
cucumbers, eggplant, lettuce, onions, peas, peaches, peppers,
potatoes (white and sweet), spinach, squash, strawberries, sweet
corn and tomatoes. Organic produce is also including in the program.
Each sample collected is analyzed for over 100 different pesticide
residues, including environmental contaminants such as DDT and
dieldrin. As this program continues to expand, more commodities
and sampling locations will be added to help further ensure the
quality of the fresh produce in New Jersey.
Detailed reports and analytical results are
available on the Publications
page.
PRIVATE APPLICATOR CREDIT INCENTIVE SURVEYS
In 2007, PEMS (Pesticide Evaluation
& Monitoring Section) began a series of surveys for Private
Applicators. These surveys were designed to collect information
about issues and concerns regarding various types of agriculture
through out NJ. The surveys include Integrated Pest Management
(IPM), Vineyard, Nursery and Direct Marketing. In exchange for
completing a survey, the Private Applicator received one unit
of Core credit towards their pesticide license recertification.
The data from these surveys will be evaluated and used to determine
where the Pesticide Control Program can best assist New Jersey's
agricultural community.
Summaries of the Private Applicator surveys
are available on the Publications
page.
GROUND WATER MONITORING NETWORK
As part of the EPA's ground water protection
initiative, a series of monitoring wells were installed (and
continue to be installed) under the direction of PEMS since
1997. Wells were placed in areas showing higher agricultural
pesticide use and are relatively shallow (20-50 feet in depth),
reaching into subsurface aquifers. Wells are sampled on a routine
schedule to obtain a data set of pesticide residue detections,
the results directing the PCP to further investigation of problem
pesticides and areas. Thirty-two wells are currently in place
in central and south New Jersey. As of 2008, three of the thirty-two
wells have shown consistent detections.
A detailed report of analytical results is available
on the Publications
page.
PESTCIDES IN MOSQUITO CONTROL PROJECT
The current project focus is the ground-based
application of resmethrin and prallethrin for adult mosquito
control. A major goal of the project is to determine the extent
of the migration of the pesticide away from the target area
and the amount of residue deposited in and around the site of
application. Another goal is to determine how long the pesticide
remains suspended in the air column after an application. Movement
of the applied pesticide through wooded canopies and wide-open
areas has been examined utilizing various sampling matrices
including water, surface wipes and filter paper.
PEMS is currently working with Mercer county
Division of Mosquito Control to monitor their routine ground-based
ULV resmethrin and prallethrin applications. The current study
site provides a wide range of sampling opportunities including
ground and suspended (hanging) samples, wooded areas, open fields,
and surface water. This work, coupled with previous work with
the Bergen County Mosquito Control Program, leads PEMS to believe
that humidity plays a significant role in the deposition of
resmethrin after an application. PEMS will continue cooperate
with the state mosquito organizations to investigate the impact
of meteorological conditions on mosquito control applications
in the coming years.
DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION OF CLEAN-UP PROCEDURES
In the course of investigations, the PCP frequently
provides clean-up recommendations in a variety of settings.
When initial cleanups fail to significantly lower the residue
levels, the suppositions are that either the cleanup was not
performed, despite the documentation, as per the recommendations
or that the clean up recommendations themselves are not effective.
In particular, several times over the past few years, PCP investigators
have encountered Fipronil spills and/or misapplications that
appear to be resistant to cleanup efforts. Over the winter of
2006, experiments were conducted in controlled settings that
demonstrated effective cleanup methods. Subsequently, PEMS developed
cleanup procedures and recommendations based on these experiments.
PEMS is currently coordinating with PCP investigators to provide
recommendations to the responsible parties and observe and document
the spill cleanup. Post-cleanup samples will be collected to
provide further documentation of the effectiveness of the clean
up procedures to lower residue levels. PEMS will expand this
effort to encompass a wider range of pesticides and settings
over the coming years.
DCPA (DACTHAL) INVESTIGATION IN SOUTHERN NJ
Samples collected in 2005 from groundwater monitoring
wells and migrant farm camps in the Vineland area revealed significant
levels of the herbicide DCPA. Several of the samples were found
to be well above the Health Advisory Level (HAL) established
for DCPA in drinking water. Over the course of 2006, samples
were collected from additional migrant camps, groundwater wells
and surface water sites in the vicinity of the original detections.
While none of the samples and subsequent detections approached
the levels found in 2005, PEMS expanded the scope of the monitoring
to identify the extent of the contamination. In 2007, surface
water sampling sites were identified in eleven townships reporting
DCPA use. While there were some detections, none of them exceeded
the HAL. Based on all of the data collected, it appears that
the presence of DCPA is localized in the Vineland area and is
the result of routine agricultural use. PEMS will continue to
monitor this and other areas for DCPA and other compounds.
|