 |
SRRA Stakeholder Process
|
|
Site Remediation Program
Stakeholder Process
Commissioner Martin and Assisitant Commissioner Sweeney believe
that working with a broad range of stakeholders is essential to
making the transition from the old SRP paradigm to a new successful
LSRP program. To this end, the Department has set up an extensive
stakeholder process for general program issues, rules and guidance.
Names of the stakeholder committees, DEP chairpersons, and goals
of each of these stakeholder committees are provided below.
|
I. |
LSRP
Program Steering Committee:
Tom Cozzi/Karen Hershey (co-chairs)
Committee goal: To work with the Department
on the implementation of the existing LSRP program. The
Committee is comprised of SRP managers and staff, environmental
consultants, industry representatives, lawyers and members
of the environmental community. The Steering Committee meets
to discuss general program issues and propose solutions
to identified problems.
|
II. |
Technical
Guidance:
George Nicholas (DEP chair)
Kathy Kunze, Suzanne Shannon, Joe Nowak Committee
Goal: To develop topic specific Technical Guidance
that will work in concert with the Technical Rules by providing
recommendations, approaches and technical issues to be considered
in the remediation of contaminated sites. These guidance
documents should be used by the LSRP or remediating party
during the remedial process to provide a basic framework
for making decisions and for applying professional judgment.
The LSRP licensing board may also use the Guidance to help
evaluate whether professional judgment was applied appropriately
at a site.
Round 2 guidance committees and chairpersons:
(formed in September 2012)
OffSite
Source Investigation/Documentation Gwen Zervas
Co-Mingled
GW Plumes: Mary Anne Kuserk
Historic
Pesticide Use: Chris Dwyer
Capping:
Terry Sugihara
Performance
Monitoring of In-situ Ground Water Remedial Actions:
Joel Fradel and Maria VanderZelder
Evaluation
of Contaminated Ground Water Discharge to Surface Water:
Bill Hanrahan
A complete list of the guidance team members may be found at:
http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/srra/stakeholder/tech_guidance_committee_rd_2.pdf
Round 1 guidance committees and chairpersons:
(formed in July 2010)
Vapor
Intrusion: John Boyer
LNAPL:
Kevin Kratina
Receptor
Evaluation: Steve Maybury
Presumptive
Remedies: Lynne Mitchell
Immediate
Environmental Concern: Bruce Venner/Andrew
Sites
Clean
Fill/Alternative Fill:
Terry Sugihara
Historic
Fill: Kevin Schick
Technical Impracticability: Tom O’Neill
Monitored
Natural Attenuation: Matt Turner
Conceptual
Site Model: Joe Eaker
Analytical Methods: Greg Toffoli
Ecological
Investigation:
Nancy Hamill
Attainment
(Compliance): Barry Frasco/David Haymes
Preliminary
Assessment: John Doyon/Josh Gradwohl
SI/RI
Soils: John Doyon/Josh Gradwohl
PA/SI/RI
Groundwater: Bill Hanrahan
A complete list of the guidance team members may be found at:
http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/srra/stakeholder/tech_guidance_committee.pdf
Guidance document review process:
When a draft final guidance document is completed by a Committee,
all Committee members should review the document and support
releasing the document for external review. The document
will be distributed to Stakeholders on all of the 2nd Round
Technical Guidance Committees for review and comment. Those
Stakeholders receiving the document will also be requested
to assume responsibility for coordinating reviews within
their respective constituencies and funneling comments back
to the Committee Chairperson. The draft guidance document
will also be distributed to the SRP Assistant Commissioner’s
office and any interested DEP-SRP staff for review and comment.
In addition, Stakeholders on the SRRA Steering Committee
will have an opportunity to review the document for major
flaws and this review will be coordinated by the DEP Steering
Committee Chairperson. The review period for draft Guidance
documents will be six weeks. Following the close of the
comment period, the Technical Guidance Committee issuing
the document will review all comments and revise the document,
if necessary, in response to comments received. Significant
technical comments will be addressed in writing by the Committee
and posted on the DEP’s Web page as a “Response
to Comments” document. After final revision, the Technical
Guidance Committee will release the document as a “Final
Technical Guidance” document, it will be posted on
the DEP’s SRP Guidance Library webpage and a SRRA
Listserve message will be issued.
|
III. |
Remedial
Prioirity System:
George Klein (DEP chair)
Committee goal: To develop a Remedial
Priority Scoring (RPS) system to measure each contaminated
site's relative risk to human and ecological health. The
system will be based on the Department’s existing
electronic data and will be enhanced as new data, improved
logic and additional capabilities become available.
|
| |
|
|
Additional stakeholder
efforts:
|
| |
|
|
| IV.
|
Site
Remediation Advisory Group and Cooperative Venture Program
David Haymes (DEP chair)
Committee goal: The Site Remediation
Advisory Group (SRAG) and Cooperative Venture Project (CVP)
meetings are a valuable opportunity for stakeholders to
meet with Department personnel to discuss specific technical
and administrative issues concerning their constituencies.
These meetings will be an interactive forum where targeted
information is presented and problems and issues are discussed
and resolved. The goal of the Site Remediation Program is
to make the remedial process more transparent, predictable
and efficient. These meetings will help achieve that goal
and promote the Department’s Stakeholder process.
|
| V. |
Rules
for Petroleum Storage Tanks Not Regulated by N.J.A.C. 7:14B
(UHOT Rules and Guidance)
Ken
Kloo (Rule Manager)
Stakeholder group: Yes
A complete list of the UHOT Rule team members may be found
at:
http://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/srra/stakeholder/uhot_stakeholder_contact_info.pdf
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |