|
1
|
- New Jersey School Boards Association
- October 26, 2006
- Atlantic City, New Jersey
- Presenters:
- New Jersey Department of Education
- Penelope E. Lattimer, Ph.D., Chief of Staff
- Diane Schonyers, Director
- Office of Strategic Initiatives and Accountability
- Donna Arons, Special Assistant to the Commissioner
|
|
2
|
- What is NJQSAC?
- NJQSAC is the Department of Education’s new monitoring and evaluation
system.
- Its primary purpose is to measure and improve school district
performance in meeting State standards.
- It is also designed to ensure all districts operate at a high level of
performance.
|
|
3
|
- Continued…
- It replaces the old monitoring system and integrates many of the
requirements of:
- Existing Code and Statute
- State Takeover Law
- Federal Mandates
|
|
4
|
- Impetus for change included the following considerations:
- Inclusion of clear standards of performance;
- Effectiveness in the focus and identification of needs earlier in
process;
- Efficiency in delivery of technical assistance to districts;
- Prevention of outcomes that result from unaddressed
- problems;
- Collaboration between Department of Education and districts;
- Swift involvement of Department of Education for only the time necessary
in the specific areas of need;
- Recognition and support for district progress;
- Build capacity at the district level; and
- Build public understanding of district performance among educators,
policy makers, legislators, and citizens.
|
|
5
|
- NJQSAC ………
- Applies to all school districts, except
- Educational Services
Commissions
- and Charter Schools
|
|
6
|
- NJQSAC ………
- Supports efficient use of district resources
- Emphasizes family and community involvement
- Sets expectations for student achievement
- Uses a uniform tool of evaluation titled “District Performance Review”
(DPR)
|
|
7
|
- While NJQSAC is new, the
monitoring site visit will integrate several state and federal program
requirements and will replace the 7-year cycle certification and annual
Quality Assurance Annual Review (QAAR).
- The process will continue to include Quality Performance Indicators as
the first step in determining the effectiveness of school districts.
|
|
8
|
- There are 5 components of school district effectiveness:
- Instruction and Program
- Personnel
- Fiscal Management
- Operations
- Governance
|
|
9
|
- Each DPR has a Quality Indicator for each of the 5 components. Each:
- Is weighted;
- Has a total score to determine district effectiveness;
- Requires a response based on data and documentation; and
- Must be verified by NJDOE personnel.
|
|
10
|
- Instruction and Program
- indicators focus on:
- Student performance
- Curriculum
- Instructional priorities
- Mandated programs
- Early childhood programs
- High school practices/graduation
|
|
11
|
- Personnel indicators focus on:
- Appropriate certifications and licensing of personnel
- Personnel policies
- Professional development
|
|
12
|
- Fiscal Management will focus on:
- Budget planning
- Financial and budgetary control
- Annual audit
- Treatment of restricted revenue
- Efficiency
|
|
13
|
- Operations indicators will include:
- Public school district facilities
- Student conduct, school safety and security
- Student health
- Student support services
|
|
14
|
- Governance indicators will focus on:
- District board policies promoting student achievement
- District board training, disclosure and operation
- Ethics compliance
- District board policies, procedures and by-laws
- Standard school board practices
- Annual evaluative process
- District board/administration collaboration
- District board budget priorities
- District board communications
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Establishes the focus of the district
- Participates in the completion of the DPR
- Approves DPR findings and Improvement Plans
- Communicates outcomes and ongoing progress to the public
|
|
18
|
- Review of districts;
- Uniform self-evaluation tool (DPR) will be completed by districts;
- The CSA shall select and convene a local committee to complete the DPR
as a first step in determining the effectiveness of school districts;
- NJDOE conducts a review and verification of completed DPR as well as relevant data
and information; and
- An on-site visit may be conducted.
|
|
19
|
- NJDOE places districts on the performance continuum for each of the 5
components.
- Based on the results of the review, districts may need Improvement Plan
(IP) and may receive technical assistance.
- If necessary, a Highly Skilled Professional (HSP) may provide assistance
to the districts.
- NJQSAC provides for partial and full intervention under specific
circumstances.
|
|
20
|
- Who:
- Defined in proposed regulations as a designee of the Commissioner who
has skills and expertise based on education and experience in one or
more of the five key components of school district effectiveness.
- What:
- Highly Skilled Professionals may assist the department in evaluating
district performance and assist public school districts in developing
local capacity in areas of critical need identified through the
monitoring process.
|
|
21
|
- Cost:
- When appointed by the Commissioner, the cost of the HSP shall be shared
between the district and the department.
- When not required by NJDOE but requested by the district, the cost shall
be assumed by the district.
|
|
22
|
- The following activities may be required of a district:
- In-depth evaluation by team convened by the department
- Improvement plan aligned with other plans and reports
- Focused technical assistance
- On-site monitoring by the department
|
|
23
|
- Partial or full intervention may
be initiated when:
- District satisfies less than 50%
of weighted performance
indicators in one or more areas AND one of following:
- Failure to submit self-assessment/other documentation;
- Failure to develop satisfactory IP;
- Failure to satisfactorily implement IP;
- Other circumstances exist warranting immediate action by DOE; or
- Other circumstances indicating insufficient local capacity of the
district to provide a thorough and efficient education.
|
|
24
|
- Commissioner, with approval of State Board, can appoint up to 3
additional board members
- 6 months later, Commissioner decides whether they will be voting members
- Appointed members serve for an initial term of 2 years
|
|
25
|
- Board is advisory
- Commissioner, with approval of State Board, may appoint up to 3
additional members
- 6 months later, Commissioner decides whether they will be voting members
- Appointed members serve for an initial term of 2 years
|
|
26
|
- Evidence of sustained and substantial progress (compliance with 80 to
100% of performance indicators in one or more components); and
- Adequate programs, policies and personnel in place and in operation to
ensure that demonstrated progress will be maintained
|
|
27
|
- NCLB Consolidated Plan
- Collaborative Assessment and
Planning
- for Achievement Program (CAPA)
- report
- 2 year Instructional Priorities
- School and district improvement
plans
- Special Education corrective
action
- plans (NJQSAC requires, for
some districts,
- an improvement plan as the
overarching plan
- for the district)
|
|
28
|
- State-operated districts, Level II and Level III districts will be:
- evaluated by a team of HSPs and
- placed on the performance continuum by the Commissioner and notified
within 30 days
|
|
29
|
- Level I districts will be evaluated by the Commissioner.
- The Commissioner will determine the evaluation schedule and will use a
phased-in approach.
|
|
30
|
|