|
1
|
- Collaborative Assessment for Planning & Achievement
|
|
2
|
- Ask questions for your understanding and support
- Conduct discussions in a professional manner
- Agree to listen, honor and respect all perspectives
- Be mindful of the patterns of participation—give everyone an opportunity
to speak—refrain from side conversations
- Use the parking lot
- Put cell phones on silent
|
|
3
|
- 4-day Handbook
- Teaching and Learning Tool
- 4-day Protocols
- PowerPoint
- Reflection Form
- Workshop Flyer
|
|
4
|
- Agenda & Background
- Preparing for the Visit
- What Occurs on a Visit
- CAPA Teaching and Learning Tool
- Classroom Walkthroughs
- Summary Report
- Follow Up
- Reflection
|
|
5
|
- What is CAPA?
- Who receives a CAPA Visit?
- How to prepare for a CAPA Visit?
- What occurs before, during and after a CAPA visit?
- Who to contact with questions about a CAPA visit?
|
|
6
|
- A teaching and learning collaboration between the New Jersey Department
of Education, districts, local educators and parents
- Designed to empower schools and districts to go beyond current efforts
- To improve student achievement.
|
|
7
|
- To provide feedback that will assist the school in developing and
committing to the execution of an action plan to further student
advancement
- To jointly determine the root causes hindering student advancement
|
|
8
|
- Schools listed as “in need of improvement” in year three and above of
school improvement status
|
|
9
|
- The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires all states to
establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in
their states.
- The foundation for the accountability system is based on a state’s
academic content standards and aligned assessments.
- The accountability system looks at the degree to which students across
schools and districts are mastering the state standards.
|
|
10
|
- Schools are evaluated using adequate yearly progress (AYP) indicators.
- Student achievement is determined by grade span and each content area.
- There are 40 indicators that must be met (including participation and
proficiency rates) plus secondary indicators.
- A safe harbor calculation is applied to measure progress if AYP is
missed
- When a school does not meet AYP, it may be designated as a school in
need of improvement.
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- In addition, the LEA must take at least one of the following corrective
actions§1116(b)(7)(C); §200.42:
- Institute a new curriculum grounded in scientifically based research and
provide appropriate professional development to support its
implementation
- Extend the length of the school year or school day
- Replace the school staff who are deemed relevant to the school not
making adequate progress
|
|
15
|
- Significantly decrease management authority at the school
- Restructure the internal organization of the school
- Appoint one or more outside experts to advise the school (1) how to
revise and strengthen the improvement plan it created while in school
improvement status; and (2) how to address the specific issues
underlying the school’s continued inability to make AYP
|
|
16
|
- Total
- White
- African-American
- Hispanic
- Asian/Pacific Islander
- Native American/Indian
- One or more Races (multiple category)
- Economically disadvantaged
- Students with disabilities
- Limited English proficient
|
|
17
|
- IEP exempt from Passing
- Used for Graduation requirement
- NCLB requires that all students be tested
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- A confidence interval (CI) is a statistical method to minimize the risk
of misclassifying schools.
- A confidence interval at 95% probability is applied to the actual
proficiency results for the total population as well as each student
subgroup for each content area.
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- A process involving an external team of educators and parents working in
collaboration with school and district personnel to
- pinpoint obstacles to student achievement,
- identify needs and
- develop solutions to improve school performance.
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- YouTube - Let's build a filter
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
- Use only the materials given.
- Additional materials are available
- Do not eat the materials
- Lay out paper as a working surface
- Build a tower in 20 minutes using the materials provided
- The team that builds the highest tower that stays upright for 10 seconds
wins a prize
|
|
34
|
- What was the initial reaction of your team?
- What roles did people play?
- How did you solve the problem?
- What other situations (e.g., at school, home or work) are like the tower
activity?
- Observer feedback/reporting out
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Team Leader
- Principal
- Language Arts Literacy Specialist
- Mathematics Specialist
- Special Education Specialist
- ELL Specialist
- Parent/School Climate
|
|
39
|
- District Liaison
- LAL Coach, Lead Teacher or Department Chair
- Math Coach, Lead Teacher or Department Chair
- Inclusion Coach, Lead Teacher or Department Chair
- ELL Lead Teacher or Department Chair
- Parent Liaison/School Culture Specialist
- Union Representative
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Team leaders are allocated one day to assist the school in preparation
for the visit
- Principal and planning committee should determine how best to use this
planning day
- Examples of assistance:
development of schedule, selection of staff for focus groups,
presentation to staff, explanation of administrative walkthrough or data
analysis
|
|
43
|
- Explain the process to the school faculty
- Select school team members
- Establish a CAPA planning committee
- Involve the NCLB Planning Committee
- Involve building union representation
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- Internal and external team members should become familiar with the
following documents prior to the visit:
- State assessment data by grade and cluster
- NCLB unified plan
- Other formative assessment data
- School Improvement Status Summary
- Adequate Yearly Progress Status
- One & Three-Year Trend Charts
- School climate survey
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
- Planning Day
- One hour visit planning for district/school and external team
- External/internal team reviews data, NCLB unified plan and school
portfolio
- Begin interviews and visits
|
|
48
|
- Days Two and Three
- Interviews
- Classroom visits
- Subteam debriefing of findings
- Debriefing of full group
- Begin writing findings
|
|
49
|
- Day Four
- Team debriefing for assigned indicators
- Writing and reviewing information
- Subteams present findings, recommendations, proposed action plans
|
|
50
|
- Within one week of visit
- Work with internal team to refine action plans
- Review final summary report for accuracy
- Assistance with presentation to faculty
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
- For staff--individual or small group (no more than 6-8)
- For the NCLB committee-whole group
- For parents--scheduled in groups – no fewer than 10
- For students—representation of all grade levels & abilities—formally
and informally
|
|
53
|
- I&RS Committee
- NCLB Committee, site-based management team or SLC
- Parents
- Students (randomly selected across grade levels—10% of student body)
- Teachers
- Child Study Team
- Administrators
- Guidance Staff
|
|
54
|
- Room for debriefing and document review
- Room for interviews & focus groups
- Computers, LCD projector, photocopying
- Emergency numbers
|
|
55
|
- School vision & mission
- Master schedule—individual staff schedules
- Staff roster
- Bell schedule
- Floor plan
- NCLB committee names
- Background information form
|
|
56
|
- Instructors
- Administrators
- URL Available from Team Leader
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
- Meeting Minutes
- Parent Information
- Meeting Agendas
- Curriculum Documents
- HQT Documents
- Curriculum Reports
- Code of Conduct Policy
- NCLB Unified Plan
- Suspension Reports
- 10 Report Cards
- 10 PDPs and evaluations
- Professional Development Plan
- School/ Community Survey Parent Involvement Policy
|
|
59
|
- Lesson Plans
- Student Work
- Student Portfolios
- Student Projects
- Student Journals
- Student Assessments
- Grade Books
|
|
60
|
- Curriculum Documents
- DINI Plan (if applicable)
- Strategic Plan
- Technology Plan
- Parent Involvement Policy
- NCLB & SES Communications & Reports
- Comprehensive Equity Plan
|
|
61
|
- For staff can be either individual or small group (6-8 people)
- For the NCLB planning team or SLC should be whole group
- For parents should be scheduled in groups – as many as possible
- Interview 10% of student body—formally and informally
|
|
62
|
- Security Staff
- Nurse
- Social Worker
- NCLB Planning Committee
- Parents
- 10% of students (randomly selected across grade levels)
- Teachers
- Paraprofessionals
- Child Study Team
- Administrators
- Guidance Staff
- District Administrators
|
|
63
|
- A random selection of classrooms will be visited
- The classrooms are chosen by the team leader
- The principal determines the classrooms visited for the administrative
walkthrough
- Subteams determine classrooms to visit for content and
|
|
64
|
- Walkthroughs provide a school wide snapshot, over time, of classroom
environments, learning experiences and student perspectives
- Walkthroughs are not part of the evaluation process
- Walkthroughs are a catalyst for reflective school wide discussion
|
|
65
|
- Promote a collaborative atmosphere for the visit
- Help gauge the overall school environment
- Help provide a shared language for teaching and learning
- Teams see the same data
|
|
66
|
|
|
67
|
- Used to help determine specifically where you are regarding goals and
benchmarks for higher student achievement
- Also used to help determine what action steps the school and/or district
need to take to meet benchmarks at the desired levels of success
|
|
68
|
- Curriculum – where it exists and is good, is it what guides daily
instruction?
- Instructional leadership – leaders who have an unrelenting focus on
learning, therefore on instruction
- Teamwork and professional learning communities – opening up the teaching
practice of individuals to their colleagues, so that they can learn from
those who do it well.
|
|
69
|
- CAPA Descriptors, 2006, NJ DOE
- Classroom Instruction that Works, Marzano, 2001, ASCD
- The Art and Science of Teaching, Marzano, 2007, ASCD
- Leadership for Learning, Carl Glickman, 2002, ASCD
- The Differentiated Classroom, Carol Tomlinson, 1999, ASCD
- Results Now, Schmoker, 2006, ASCD
- The Basic School, Boyer, 1995, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement
of Teaching
- The Learning Leader, Reeves, 2006, ASCD
- Turnaround Leadership, Michael Fullan, 2006, Jossey-Bass
- National Forum to Accelerate Middle Grades Reform: New Jersey Schools to
Watch: Self-Study and Rating Rubric
- “Bridging the Gap between Standards and Achievement”, Richard F. Elmore,
2002, Albert Shanker Institute
- “The Leadership We Need”, Waters and Grubb, 2004, McREL: Mid-continent
Research for Education and Learning
- “Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards:
Education for the Future – the School Portfolio”, 2000, Council of Chief
State School Officers
- “Planning Change for Restructuring Schools”, Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive
Center, 12/2006
- Arizona School Reform Tool
- The Great Maine Schools Project School Change Rubric, 2005
- Pennsylvania Department of Education: 2006-2007 Review Criteria for
“Getting Results!” SIP Framework, 2004
|
|
70
|
- Structure of Teaching and Learning Tool
- A single tool for identifying best practices, collecting and analyzing
documentation, interview results, begin formulating recommendations,
recording strengths and challenges and providing a rating.
- Domains
|
|
71
|
- Within each of the 7 Standards, there are 24 specific subsections
labeled “indicators.”
- The team will write a “Finding” and assign a “Performance Level” rating
for each indicator.
- Within each of the indicators is an essential question
- Within each of the indicators there are “sub-indicators.”
|
|
72
|
- Curriculum
- Assessment & Evaluation
- Instruction
- School Climate & Culture
- Student, Family & Community Support
- Professional Learning, Growth & Development
- Leadership & Governance
|
|
73
|
- Within each of the 7 Standards, there are 24 specific subsections
labeled “indicators.”
- The team will write a “Finding” for each indicator.
|
|
74
|
- Do all teachers use the curriculum in planning instruction?
- How do students know what is expected and are they able to articulate
expectations share their work and reflect on others’ work?
- To what extent are all students engaged in learning?
|
|
75
|
- Standard 6 –The school provides for staff research-based, results-driven
professional development opportunities that are consistent with the
district’s professional development plan, and implements performance
evaluation procedures in order to improve teaching and learning. (Objective)
- Indicator 6.1 - The school and district devote resources to content-rich
professional development that is connected to reaching and sustaining
the school vision and goals for increasing student achievement and is
differentiated by teacher and student needs. (Strategy)
- Sub-indicators: Professional
development is embedded, intensive, of high quality, ongoing, and
relevant to various grade level education and provides opportunities for
learning that increase knowledge and skills, challenge outmoded beliefs
and practices, and provide support in the classroom. (Actions)
|
|
76
|
- Seen in classrooms
- Read in documents
- Heard in interviews
|
|
77
|
- Available at:
- http://www.nj.gov/education/capa/docs/
- Click Teaching & Learning Tool
|
|
78
|
- Background statement regarding each standard using essential questions
- Notes strengths, challenges, root causes and recommendations
- Team determines most critical recommendations
- Separate school and district sections
- Incorporated into the school’s NCLB unified plan
|
|
79
|
- FINDINGS: Compilations of data
about the school substantiated by TRIANGULATION (at least three sources
of data such as an observation, an interview, or written documentation).
- RECOMMENDATIONS: Research-based strategies and best practices suggested
by the team for each standard. Subteams determine 2-3 high priority
recommendations.
- ACTION STEPS: The team
prioritizes and develops a short plan for implementation of 3
recommendations.
|
|
80
|
- Based on triangulated data
- Focused on key areas – academic performance, culture & climate,
leadership
- Question for prioritizing:
- “If the school does this well, will it significantly advance student
achievement?”
|
|
81
|
- Action Steps
- what needs to be done to implement the recommendation – action steps
- for each action step
- what strategy will be used
- expected results
- measures
- time lines
- people responsible and accountable
|
|
82
|
- While the school is in improvement status:
- One-day follow-up with team member
- Purpose: To review the progress the school is making regarding student
learning, instruction, climate and leadership by observing and
discussing implementation of strategies from the NCLB Unified Plan &
Action Plans
|
|
83
|
- Leadership
- School Culture
- Language Arts
- Mathematics
- Special Education
- English Language Learners
- Be sure to complete the reflection handout so we can continue to improve
our assistance
|
|
84
|
- “Nothing, and we mean nothing, is more critical to the future of the
world than rapidly and constantly improving systems of public schooling
that serve all students.”
- Breakthrough, Michal Fullan, Peter Hill, Carmel Crevola
|