Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
4-Day CAPA Orientation
  • Collaborative Assessment for Planning & Achievement
2
Agreements
  • Ask questions for your understanding and support
  • Conduct discussions in a professional manner
  • Agree to listen, honor and respect all perspectives
  • Be mindful of the patterns of participation—give everyone an opportunity to speak—refrain from side conversations
  • Use the parking lot
  • Put cell phones on silent
3
Workshop Handouts
  • 4-day Handbook
  • Teaching and Learning Tool
  • 4-day Protocols
  • PowerPoint
  • Reflection Form
  • Workshop Flyer


4
Agenda
  • Agenda & Background
  • Preparing for the Visit
  • What Occurs on a Visit
  • CAPA Teaching and Learning Tool
  • Classroom Walkthroughs
  • Summary Report
  • Follow Up
  • Reflection
5
In this session, you will learn:
  • What is CAPA?
  • Who receives a CAPA Visit?
  • How to prepare for a CAPA Visit?
  • What occurs before, during and after a CAPA visit?
  • Who to contact with questions about a CAPA visit?
6
CAPA is:
  • A teaching and learning collaboration between the New Jersey Department of Education, districts, local educators and parents
  • Designed to empower schools and districts to go beyond current efforts
  • To improve student achievement.
7
Purpose
  • To provide feedback that will assist the school in developing and committing to the execution of an action plan to further student advancement
  • To jointly determine the root causes hindering student advancement
8
Who receives a visit?
  • Schools listed as “in need of improvement” in year three and above of school improvement status
9
Federal Requirements
  • The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states.
  • The foundation for the accountability system is based on a state’s academic content standards and aligned assessments.
  • The accountability system looks at the degree to which students across schools and districts are mastering the state standards.


10
New Jersey Requirements
  • Schools are evaluated using adequate yearly progress (AYP) indicators.
  • Student achievement is determined by grade span and each content area.
  • There are 40 indicators that must be met (including participation and proficiency rates) plus secondary indicators.
  • A safe harbor calculation is applied to measure progress if AYP is missed
  • When a school does not meet AYP, it may be designated as a school in need of improvement.
11
AYP Performance Benchmarks
12
School Improvement Continuum Chart
13
School Improvement Continuum Chart
14
NCLB Corrective Actions:
  • In addition, the LEA must take at least one of the following corrective actions§1116(b)(7)(C); §200.42:
  • Institute a new curriculum grounded in scientifically based research and provide appropriate professional development to support its implementation
  • Extend the length of the school year or school day
  • Replace the school staff who are deemed relevant to the school not making adequate progress


15
NCLB Corrective Actions:
  • Significantly decrease management authority at the school
  • Restructure the internal organization of the school
  • Appoint one or more outside experts to advise the school (1) how to revise and strengthen the improvement plan it created while in school improvement status; and (2) how to address the specific issues underlying the school’s continued inability to make AYP
16
Student Subgroups
  • Total
  • White
  • African-American
  • Hispanic
  • Asian/Pacific Islander
  • Native American/Indian
  • One or more Races (multiple category)
  • Economically disadvantaged
  • Students with disabilities
  • Limited English proficient
17
IEP Students
  • IEP exempt from Passing
    • Used for Graduation requirement
    • NCLB requires that all students be tested



18
School Improvement Status Summary
19
Adequate Yearly Progress Status Under NCLB
20
Three Year Student Performance Math
21
Three Year Student Performance - LAL
22
AYP 08-09 Chart - LAL
23
AYP 08-09 Chart - Math
24
95% Confidence Interval
  • A confidence interval (CI) is a statistical method to minimize the risk of misclassifying schools.


  • A confidence interval at 95% probability is applied to the actual proficiency results for the total population as well as each student subgroup for each content area.
25
Digging Deeper—LAL Clusters
26
Digging Deeper—Math Clusters
27
Special Education-Math
28
CAPA is:
  • A process involving an external team of educators and parents working in collaboration with school and district personnel to
      • pinpoint obstacles to student achievement,
      • identify needs and
      • develop solutions to improve school performance.
29
Task-Oriented Team Development
30
High Performance Teams
31
"YouTube - Let's build a..."
  • YouTube - Let's build a filter
32
Team Activity
33
Get ready teams…
  • Use only the materials given.
  • Additional materials are available
  • Do not eat the materials
  • Lay out paper as a working surface
  • Build a tower in 20 minutes using the materials provided
  • The team that builds the highest tower that stays upright for 10 seconds wins a prize
34
Processing the Activity
  • What was the initial reaction of your team?
  • What roles did people play?
  • How did you solve the problem?
  • What other situations (e.g., at school, home or work) are like the tower activity?
  • Observer feedback/reporting out
35
We Know That:
36
We Know That:
37
How will we work together to improve teaching & learning?
  • CAPA Collaborative Teams
38
"Team Leader"
  • Team Leader
  • Principal
  • Language Arts Literacy Specialist
  • Mathematics Specialist
  • Special Education Specialist
  • ELL Specialist
  • Parent/School Climate



39
Internal CAPA Team
  • District Liaison
  • LAL Coach, Lead Teacher or Department Chair
  • Math Coach, Lead Teacher or Department Chair
  • Inclusion Coach, Lead Teacher or Department Chair
  • ELL Lead Teacher or Department Chair
  • Parent Liaison/School Culture Specialist
  • Union Representative


40
Subteams
41
What should b e done to prepare for a visit?
42
Team Leader Planning Day
  • Team leaders are allocated one day to assist the school in preparation for the visit
  • Principal and planning committee should determine how best to use this planning day
  • Examples of assistance: development of schedule, selection of staff for focus groups, presentation to staff, explanation of administrative walkthrough or data analysis


43
Prior to the visit
  • Explain the process to the school faculty
  • Select school team members
  • Establish a CAPA planning committee
  • Involve the NCLB Planning Committee
  • Involve building union representation


44
Planning Committee
45
Document Review - Prior
  • Internal and external team members should become familiar with the following documents prior to the visit:
      • State assessment data by grade and cluster
      • NCLB unified plan
      • Other formative assessment data
      • School Improvement Status Summary
      • Adequate Yearly Progress Status
      • One & Three-Year Trend Charts
      • School climate survey
46
What occurs during a CAPA visit?
47
Internal/External Team Schedule
    • Planning Day
      • One hour visit planning for district/school and external team
      • External/internal team reviews data, NCLB unified plan and school portfolio
      • Begin interviews and visits
48
Internal/External Team Schedule
    • Days Two and Three
      • Interviews
      • Classroom visits
      • Subteam debriefing of findings
      • Debriefing of full group
      • Begin writing findings
49
Internal/External Team Schedule
    • Day Four
      • Team debriefing for assigned indicators
      • Writing and reviewing information
      • Subteams present findings, recommendations, proposed action plans

50
Team Lead Follow Up Day
  • Within one week of visit
  • Work with internal team to refine action plans
  • Review final summary report for accuracy
  • Assistance with presentation to faculty
51
What occurs during a CAPA visit?
52
Visit Schedule
  • For staff--individual or small group (no more than 6-8)
  • For the NCLB committee-whole group
  • For parents--scheduled in groups – no fewer than 10
  • For students—representation of all grade levels & abilities—formally and informally


53
Interview Schedule
  • I&RS Committee
  • NCLB Committee, site-based management team or SLC
  • Parents
  • Students (randomly selected across grade levels—10% of student body)
  • Teachers
  • Child Study Team
  • Administrators
  • Guidance Staff
54
Team Needs
  • Room for debriefing and document review
  • Room for interviews & focus groups
  • Computers, LCD projector, photocopying
  • Emergency numbers
55
Team Folder
  • School vision & mission
  • Master schedule—individual staff schedules
  • Staff roster
  • Bell schedule
  • Floor plan
  • NCLB committee names
  • Background information form




56
School Culture Survey
  • Instructors
  • Administrators
  • URL Available from Team Leader


57
What is the school portfolio?
58
School Portfolio Examples
  • Meeting Minutes
  • Parent Information
  • Meeting Agendas
  • Curriculum Documents
  • HQT Documents
  • Curriculum Reports
  • Code of Conduct Policy
  • NCLB Unified Plan
  • Suspension Reports
  • 10 Report Cards
  • 10 PDPs and evaluations
  • Professional Development Plan
  • School/ Community Survey Parent Involvement Policy


59
Classroom Portfolio Examples
  • Lesson Plans
  • Student Work
  • Student Portfolios
  • Student Projects
  • Student Journals
  • Student Assessments
  • Grade Books
60
District Document Examples
  • Curriculum Documents
  • DINI Plan (if applicable)
  • Strategic Plan
  • Technology Plan
  • Parent Involvement Policy
  • NCLB & SES Communications & Reports
  • Comprehensive Equity Plan
61
Interviews
    • For staff can be either individual or small group (6-8 people)
    • For the NCLB planning team or SLC should be whole group
    • For parents should be scheduled in groups – as many as possible
    • Interview 10% of student body—formally and informally
62
Interviews to be scheduled:
  • Security Staff
  • Nurse
  • Social Worker
  • NCLB Planning Committee
  • Parents
  • 10% of students (randomly selected across grade levels)


  • Teachers
  • Paraprofessionals
  • Child Study Team
  • Administrators
  • Guidance Staff
  • District Administrators
63
Administrative & Content Walkthroughs
  • A random selection of classrooms will be visited
  • The classrooms are chosen by the team leader
  • The principal determines the classrooms visited for the administrative walkthrough
  • Subteams determine classrooms to visit for content and


64
Walkthrough Process
  • Walkthroughs provide a school wide snapshot, over time, of classroom environments, learning experiences and student perspectives
  • Walkthroughs are not part of the evaluation process
  • Walkthroughs are a catalyst for reflective school wide discussion
65
Rationale
  • Promote a collaborative atmosphere for the visit
  • Help gauge the overall school environment
  • Help provide a shared language for teaching and learning
  • Teams see the same data
66
What guides the visit?
67
CAPA
Teaching & Learning Tool
  • Used to help determine specifically where you are regarding goals and benchmarks for higher student achievement


  • Also used to help determine what action steps the school and/or district need to take to meet benchmarks at the desired levels of success
68
Focus on Research-based Strategies
  • Curriculum – where it exists and is good, is it what guides daily instruction?
  • Instructional leadership – leaders who have an unrelenting focus on learning, therefore on instruction
  • Teamwork and professional learning communities – opening up the teaching practice of individuals to their colleagues, so that they can learn from those who do it well.


69
Research Base
  • CAPA Descriptors, 2006, NJ DOE
  • Classroom Instruction that Works, Marzano, 2001, ASCD
  • The Art and Science of Teaching, Marzano, 2007, ASCD
  • Leadership for Learning, Carl Glickman, 2002, ASCD
  • The Differentiated Classroom, Carol Tomlinson, 1999, ASCD
  • Results Now, Schmoker, 2006, ASCD
  • The Basic School, Boyer, 1995, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
  • The Learning Leader, Reeves, 2006, ASCD
  • Turnaround Leadership, Michael Fullan, 2006, Jossey-Bass
  • National Forum to Accelerate Middle Grades Reform: New Jersey Schools to Watch: Self-Study and Rating Rubric
  • “Bridging the Gap between Standards and Achievement”, Richard F. Elmore, 2002, Albert Shanker Institute
  • “The Leadership We Need”, Waters and Grubb, 2004, McREL: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning
  • “Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards: Education for the Future – the School Portfolio”, 2000, Council of Chief State School Officers
  • “Planning Change for Restructuring Schools”, Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center, 12/2006
  • Arizona School Reform Tool
  • The Great Maine Schools Project School Change Rubric, 2005
  • Pennsylvania Department of Education: 2006-2007 Review Criteria for “Getting Results!” SIP Framework, 2004
70
Structure
  • Structure of Teaching and Learning Tool
    • A single tool for identifying best practices, collecting and analyzing documentation, interview results, begin formulating recommendations, recording strengths and challenges and providing a rating.
  • Domains
    • Standards
      • Indicators
        • Subindicators
71
Standards & Indicators
  • Within each of the 7 Standards, there are 24 specific subsections labeled “indicators.”
  • The team will write a “Finding” and assign a “Performance Level” rating for each indicator.
  • Within each of the indicators is an essential question
  • Within each of the indicators there are “sub-indicators.”
72
Standards
  • Curriculum
  • Assessment & Evaluation
  • Instruction
  • School Climate & Culture
  • Student, Family & Community Support
  • Professional Learning, Growth & Development
  • Leadership & Governance
73
Indicators
  • Within each of the 7 Standards, there are 24 specific subsections labeled “indicators.”


  • The team will write a “Finding” for each indicator.
74
Essential Questions
  • Do all teachers use the curriculum in planning instruction?
  • How do students know what is expected and are they able to articulate expectations share their work and reflect on others’ work?
  • To what extent are all students engaged in learning?


75
Using the Tool
  • Standard 6 –The school provides for staff research-based, results-driven professional development opportunities that are consistent with the district’s professional development plan, and implements performance evaluation procedures in order to improve teaching and learning. (Objective)


  • Indicator 6.1 - The school and district devote resources to content-rich professional development that is connected to reaching and sustaining the school vision and goals for increasing student achievement and is differentiated by teacher and student needs. (Strategy)


  • Sub-indicators:  Professional development is embedded, intensive, of high quality, ongoing, and relevant to various grade level education and provides opportunities for learning that increase knowledge and skills, challenge outmoded beliefs and practices, and provide support in the classroom. (Actions)


76
Triangulation
  • Seen in classrooms
  • Read in documents
  • Heard in interviews
77
Teaching & Learning Tool
  • Available at:
  • http://www.nj.gov/education/capa/docs/
  • Click Teaching & Learning Tool
78
Summary Report/Action Plan
  • Background statement regarding each standard using essential questions
  • Notes strengths, challenges, root causes and recommendations
  • Team determines most critical recommendations
  • Separate school and district sections
  • Incorporated into the school’s NCLB unified plan




79
Summary Report
  • FINDINGS:  Compilations of data about the school substantiated by TRIANGULATION (at least three sources of data such as an observation, an interview, or written documentation).


  • RECOMMENDATIONS: Research-based strategies and best practices suggested by the team for each standard. Subteams determine 2-3 high priority recommendations.


  • ACTION STEPS:  The team prioritizes and develops a short plan for implementation of 3 recommendations.


80
Recommendations
  • Based on triangulated data
  • Focused on key areas – academic performance, culture & climate, leadership
  • Question for prioritizing:
  • “If the school does this well, will it significantly advance student achievement?”
81
Action Planning
  • Action Steps
    • what needs to be done to implement the recommendation – action steps
    • for each action step
      • what strategy will be used
      • expected results
      • measures
      • time lines
      • people responsible and accountable
82
Benchmark Meeting Process
  • While the school is in improvement status:
  • One-day follow-up with team member
  • Purpose: To review the progress the school is making regarding student learning, instruction, climate and leadership by observing and discussing implementation of strategies from the NCLB Unified Plan & Action Plans
83
Breakout Sessions
  • Leadership
  • School Culture
  • Language Arts
  • Mathematics
  • Special Education
  • English Language Learners
  • Be sure to complete the reflection handout so we can continue to improve our assistance
84
A Parting Thought

  • “Nothing, and we mean nothing, is more critical to the future of the world than rapidly and constantly improving systems of public schooling that serve all students.”


  • Breakthrough, Michal Fullan, Peter Hill, Carmel Crevola