|
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules Transmission of Contested Cases to the Office of Administrative Law Proposed Amendment: N.J.A.C. 1:1-8.2 Authorized By: Laura Sanders, Director, Office of Administrative Law Authority: N.J.S.A. 52:14F-5(e), (f) and (g) Calendar Reference: See Summary below for explanation of exception to calendar requirement. Proposal Number: PRN 2009-171
The agency proposal follows: Summary Under the current rules of the Office of Administrative Law, a transmittal of a contested case from an agency must include the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all parties and their attorneys or representatives. In order to operate with greater efficiency, to save staff time and resources, and to provide a decision to the parties more promptly, the Office of Administrative Law has begun to e-mail decisions to parties whenever possible. In order to facilitate this effort, it is essential that the Office of Administrative Law receive the e-mail addresses of parties. Therefore, the Office of Administrative Law is proposing to amend N.J.A.C. 1:1-8.2(a)10 to require that agencies also provide the e-mail addresses of parties whenever available. Agencies can obtain this information in the same manner as the other required data, that is, by requesting it as part of the initial pleadings or hearing requests. As the Office of Administrative Law has provided a 60-day comment period in this notice of proposal, this notice is excepted from the rulemaking calendar requirements, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:30-3.31(a)5. Social Impact Transmitting the judge's decision by e-mail when it is available for both parties will enable the Office of Administrative Law to promptly provide the decision to the interested parties, conserve staff time, and reduce the Office of Administrative Law's use of resources. Economic Impact By eliminating the mailing of initial decisions to the parties, the Office of Administrative Law should save staff time and the cost of postage. Federal Standards Statement A Federal standards analysis is not required because the contested case hearing procedures, of which the proposed amendment is a part, are promulgated in implementation of the New Jersey Administrative Procedure Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 and 52:14F-1 et seq., and are not subject to any Federal standards or requirements. Jobs Impact The proposed amendment will not generate or cause the loss of any jobs. Agriculture Industry Impact The proposed amendment will not impact on the agriculture industry. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The proposed amendment does not impose any reporting, recordkeeping or compliance requirements on small businesses, as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-16 et seq. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The amendment sets forth a new informational requirement for the transmittal of contested cases from state agencies. Smart Growth Impact The proposed amendment will have no impact on the achievement of smart growth and the implementation of the State Development and Redevelopment Plan. Housing Affordability Impact The proposed amendment adding a requirement for an agency to provide additional information in transmitting a contested case to the Office of Administrative Law will not evoke a change in the average costs associated with housing. Smart Growth Development Impact The proposed amendment adding a requirement for an agency to provide additional information in transmitting a contested case to the Office of Administrative Law will not evoke a change in housing production in Planning Areas 1 or 2, or within designated centers, under the State Development and Redevelopment Plan. Full text of the proposal follows (additions indicated in boldface thus):
(b)-(f) (No change)
1 |
||
|
|
||